Green Technology

What Is Agtech and Why Should Farmers Be Investing in It

January 20, 2020
what is agtech

Agriculture is one of the main sectors where automation is becoming more prevalent. From driverless tractors to robotic strawberry harvesters, technology is changing farming. The debate over whether this new tech is good or bad wears on. One thing is certain, though — as the planet faces new challenges posed by extreme weather, climate change and a growing population, agtech will only continue to grow more popular. The best thing for farmers to do, then, is invest in it. 

What Is Agtech?

Agtech is a relatively new industry that applies modern technology to agriculture. It also encompasses diverse solutions to steps within the food production process. This industry can be broken down into three subcategories — tech-assisted farming, new farming and revolutionary farming. 

Tech-assisted farming is the most obvious component of agtech. This specifically refers to the application of technology to improve farming techniques. These may include water management systems, soil analytics, drones and robots, and predictive analytics like weather forecasting. These advanced devices and methods allow for more precise, reliable, efficient food production and more profitable farming. Additionally, they allow farmers to use minimal quantities of fertilizers and pesticides, keeping food prices down and reducing their impact on natural ecosystems. 

New farming refers to the application of technology to develop new and improved farming techniques. This may include vertical farming, hydroponics or aerofarms. These systems allow farmers to grow crops with little to no water, soil or sunlight. Another example of new farming is aquaponics, where fish grow in indoor ponds and produce waste that acts as a food source to neighboring plants. The plants also purify wastewater to use in the ponds. These new techniques allow farmers to conserve their resources and money while still enjoying a bountiful, healthy crop. 

The third category involves revolutionary farming, which is the development of technology to create new agricultural products. For instance, scientists are now using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to improve agriculture, like engineering crops that need less water and pigs that resist viruses and produce leaner meat. Revolutionary farming will continue to change the way farmers breed animals and grow plants, and you’ll likely see more genetically modified agricultural products hitting the market in the future. 

Why Should Farmers Invest in It?

Modern technologies are continuing to increase the efficiency and yield of farms. Many investors are beginning to realize the long-term effects are well worth the investment. Agtech investment spending has increased sixfold within the past six years, with investors ranging from venture capital firms to individuals. Moreover,  since 1948, these innovations have increased U.S. agricultural growth by 170%. Meanwhile, input costs have remained nearly unchanged, and labor costs have decreased by 24%.

Historically, major corporations have played the biggest role in the growth of agtech, spending billions on its research and development. However, this has resulted in incredibly expensive solutions, technologies and systems that farmers simply cannot afford. For that to change, farmers must create their own fundraising community and slowly gain ownership over agtech advancements. By developing the new technologies themselves, farmers can shape the future of agriculture and food production processes. 

One way farmers can begin to do this is by crowdfunding capital. By raising small amounts of money from multiple investors, they can fund their own community-based innovations that start on the farm. For example, Indiegogo, an equity crowdfunding site, allows individuals to invest as little as $100 in agtech. Sites like these make it much more feasible for farmers to regain control over the technology sector that backs their business. 

Won’t the Robots Steal Our Jobs?

One of the main concerns farmers tend to have in the technology-driven world is that innovations will replace human labor and cause lower employment. Their worries aren’t exactly unfounded. The implementation of technology has resulted in job loss before. By the end of the industrial revolution, more than half of all Americas were farmers but, since then, the portion of agricultural jobs has fallen to just 1%. Innovations like tractors and machines were a primary reason for this shift, replacing most horse-drawn plows and manual laborers. 

So, while the rise of new technology reduced food and output costs and increased efficiency, it also allowed farmers to hire fewer workers. Historically, this hasn’t led to mass unemployment or impoverished societies. Of those American workers replaced by electric machinery, roughly 48% found employment in other industries like food distribution and preservation. As farmers gain more control over agtech, more workers will transition into research and development. 

If farmers still fear that agtech will come for their jobs, they might rest easier knowing that technology will only ever be able to replace a maximum 60% of workers. Although automation can substitute for human tasks in some cases, often robots can only accomplish simple, repeatable duties. So harvesting crops, like vanilla and cacao, still require humans and relies on their ability to carry out complex tasks.

Agtech Returns to Its Roots

While most consider technology futuristic, some agtech advances are actually supporting more traditional farming methods. Large industrial farms often produce greenhouse gases, create toxic runoff and overuse the land. Regenerative farming techniques, like conservation tillage and crop rotation, are making a comeback — with the help of agtech, of course. 

Solar panels, for instance, can reduce irrigation costs and act as an extra source of revenue for farmers. Additionally, converting pastures into solar fields allows the earth to rejuvenate and replenish soil nutrients. If farmers convert these fields back to crop production, they’ll produce a larger, more sustainable yield. 

Agtech is also supporting a new era of homesteading. People across the U.S. are buying land and moving to a more self-sufficient lifestyle, growing their own food and raising their own livestock. Agricultural innovation has made this easier than ever. Security cameras monitor gardens, and motion sensor floodlights ward off unwanted guests. Off-grid energy like micro hydropower generators, wind turbines and solar panels also allow homesteaders to live sufficiently and remotely if they so choose. 

Thus, agtech has more positive implications than farmers may have originally thought. From engineering better vegetables to lucrative crop rotation techniques, it has much to offer. If farmers want to reap the benefits of these innovations, they must begin by investing in them. With farmers at the forefront of agtech development, they can craft a future that best suits their needs and, thus, the needs of the planet.

1 Comment

  • Reply Be Green January 21, 2020 at 4:32 am

    By limiting itself to the agricultural realm, this survey of emerging techniques for feeding humans only makes a slight nod to the fragility of waiting for crops to mature in fields exposed to ever-increasingly unstable climate conditions.

    I believe that more radical approaches will be required to meet the needs of the current population as well as allow human populations to continue growing.

    Canadian bean crops suffered this year:

    Arable land is decreasing:

    Don’t fear though because there may. be a way forward that makes all of these problems obsolete. A paradigm shift is approaching: the possibility to grow food without land, post-agriculture.

    George Monbiot describes a Finnish research team developing nutritional cultures:

    The same team’s previous work centered on creating a bio-reactor for home use to grow fruit cultures similarly to the process of lab-grown meat:

    Farming has been great for the last 10,000 years but we’ve now come to its limit point. If the human population is to grow 10x or more, we must adopt a food source that requires much less inputs as well as eliminates the “Rube Goldberg” harvesting and distribution systems of today’s agriculture.

    Our civilization’s entire corpus of religion and calendar reflects our fundamental attachment to agriculture as a way of life but it hasn’t always been the case and it may not be the case in the future.

    A post-agricultural revolution where every home has a bio-reactor for producing the food for its inhabitants is the major step we need.

    While there may be some concerns about changing diet, the potential price for home-grown cultures is right and will quickly be absolved by the myriad of flavors available in currently-untapped species.

  • Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.